tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24847601.post6136182886484720527..comments2024-01-11T04:26:33.475-05:00Comments on Drifting Through The Grift: Five Bells! The Crazy Is Loose!griftdrifthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04509712527908530572noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24847601.post-52444373836905298862008-10-10T03:31:00.000-04:002008-10-10T03:31:00.000-04:00アーネスト賃貸アクサ三井ダイレクト設計事務所ゲーム 専門学校ウェディングショッピング枠 現金化行政書...<A HREF="http://www.earnest-arch.jp/" REL="nofollow">アーネスト</A><BR/><A HREF="http://www.jointroompia.com" REL="nofollow">賃貸</A><BR/><A HREF="http://axa-direct.under-writer.com" REL="nofollow">アクサ</A><BR/><A HREF="http://car-hikaku.net-hoken.jp/mitsui-direct" REL="nofollow">三井ダイレクト</A><BR/><A HREF="http://www.earnest-arch.jp/" REL="nofollow">設計事務所</A><BR/><A HREF="http://www.jikeicom.jp/design/" REL="nofollow">ゲーム 専門学校</A><BR/><A HREF="http://www.kepp.jp" REL="nofollow">ウェディング</A><BR/><A HREF="http://www.g-kizuna.com" REL="nofollow">ショッピング枠 現金化</A><BR/><BR/><A HREF="http://www.thg.co.jp/gyou" REL="nofollow">行政書士</A><BR/><A HREF="http://www.free-credit.jp" REL="nofollow">現金化</A><BR/><A HREF="http://www.kepp.jp" REL="nofollow">結婚式</A><BR/><A HREF="http://www.senior-house.com" REL="nofollow">有料老人ホーム</A><BR/><A HREF="http://www.business-wind.com" REL="nofollow">副業</A><BR/><A HREF="http://www.free-credit.jp" REL="nofollow">クレジットカード 現金化</A><BR/><A HREF="http://www.zks.jp" REL="nofollow">看護</A> <BR/><A HREF="http://www.palette.jp" REL="nofollow">ウェディング</A><BR/><A HREF="http://www.earnest-arch.jp" REL="nofollow">earnest</A><BR/><A HREF="http://www.jikeicom.jp/design/" REL="nofollow">デザイン 専門学校</A>Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24847601.post-86062605323299046462008-02-17T12:54:00.000-05:002008-02-17T12:54:00.000-05:00Yepper. I didn't call it "idiot-based" for no clea...Yepper. I didn't call it "idiot-based" for no clear reason at all.Grayson: Atlanta, GAhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04063253721956158654noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24847601.post-23374525400363634172008-02-13T19:35:00.000-05:002008-02-13T19:35:00.000-05:00The case law appears mixed. See here, here, and h...The case law appears mixed. See <A HREF="http://www.law.duke.edu/journals/dltr/articles/2005dltr0008.html" REL="nofollow">here</A>, <A HREF="http://www.law.berkeley.edu/institutes/bclt/pubs/annrev/exmplrs/final/mafin.pdf" REL="nofollow">here</A>, and <A HREF="http://volokh.com/posts/chain_1179795430.shtml" REL="nofollow">here</A>.<BR/><BR/>Some state laws regulating Internet activity have been struck down on dormant commerce grounds, some have not.Richard Campbellhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10196245164076003326noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24847601.post-61340966191459941282008-02-13T16:31:00.000-05:002008-02-13T16:31:00.000-05:00Patently unconstitutional! So let it be written so...Patently unconstitutional! So let it be written so let it be done!<BR/><BR/>Seriously though. Unless you have a completely closed system practically every transaction involving the internet is interstate. Whether it's a web host in California, a DNS server in Virginia, ICANN's registration servers or something as simple as your OS contacting the Naval Observatory for the correct time.<BR/><BR/>For that reason the internet may be the most tied to interstate commerce than any other system we have ever seen.<BR/><BR/>I think you could make an argument at some very granular levels but once you get to a level as high as this bill, suddenly you are involving a great many states. For that reason I believe the Supremes would definitely step in and say "ours not yours"griftdrifthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04509712527908530572noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24847601.post-78365172883556334852008-02-13T13:55:00.000-05:002008-02-13T13:55:00.000-05:00I wouldn't go with "patently unconstitutional." I...I wouldn't go with "patently unconstitutional." It might be, it might not.<BR/><BR/>But as a law that does not discriminate between Georgia owners/operators or non-Georgia owners/operators, and as said owner/operators of social networking websites could easily be found to be "doing business" in Georgia by virtue of providing their services to Georgians over the Internet, I think you could make a good defense of this law's constitutionality.<BR/><BR/>This law is dumber than a box of hammers, I grant you that, but to quote Justice Stevens: "The Constitution does not prohibit legislatures from enacting stupid laws."Richard Campbellhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10196245164076003326noreply@blogger.com