tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24847601.post4960297240864468098..comments2024-01-11T04:26:33.475-05:00Comments on Drifting Through The Grift: Four Things To Know About Redistrictinggriftdrifthttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04509712527908530572noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24847601.post-1199631668497448422011-08-15T12:52:21.917-04:002011-08-15T12:52:21.917-04:00It's a question of politcal vs. legal. Squashi...It's a question of politcal vs. legal. Squashing the Democrats does not equal VRA violation. They may have a problem with "packing" under section 2 but I could easily see a conservative court interpreting that as a matter of politics. The court doesn't get involved in "politics".<br /><br />And I did say it's sure to be wrong. ;)<br /><br />More detail later if I have time.griftdrifthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04509712527908530572noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24847601.post-80241370537924717402011-08-15T12:10:21.574-04:002011-08-15T12:10:21.574-04:00A very well-reasoned and well-written post... righ...A very well-reasoned and well-written post... right up until the last two paragraphs. *You* are able to spot the super-secret illegal gerrymandering, cleverly disguised as politics, yet federal judges are too dumb to make the same catch? I dunno... that conclusion comes across a bit thin. Why not go into specifics?Steve Perkinsnoreply@blogger.com