Showing posts with label Election 2008. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Election 2008. Show all posts

Thursday, May 13, 2010

The Best Of The Drifts - 2008 Perry Debates


Originally published October 9, 2008

Clouds And Clods In Perry

Dark skies roiled around the Georgia National Fairgrounds as the candidates for U.S. Senate and the 8th Congressional district gathered at the stage of the Reaves Arena in Perry, Ga. Perhaps, Mr. Henry asked a favor of his new landlord, for the heavens indeed opened, threatening to drown out the lows of the manure slingers who temporarily infested the hallowed home the legendary cattleman built for his beloved livestock.

Despite the exhortations of the spare but raucous audience, the blather on the stage never matched the fury of the rain lashing the roof. It seemed every time a politician opened his mouth the whipping of water on the ceiling crescendoed, causing the occasional nervous eye to stare heavenward - possibly wondering where all would run if the thing peeled off like a potato skin.

As with most debates, there were no game changers. No particularly harsh gaffes. No soul stirring moments of inspiration. No pol succumbing to the pressure, stripping off every stitch of clothing and prancing around like a chicken. Not much fun at all.

Instead, with a weird format which limited answers to a couple of minutes and 30 second rebuttals at the discretion of the moderator, the entire affair was mostly limited to sound bite pablum found in commericials.

In the big daddy event of the Senate race, Democrat Jim Martin was more confident and forceful than expected - except when he lapsed into wonkish professor mode, droning on about billions and trillions.

Incumbent Senator Saxby Chambliss talked about winning wars, cutting taxes and saving us all from the liberal menace - except when he stumbled around on the immigration question and was met with an uncomfortable silence from his previously rabid supporters.

Libertarian Allen Buckley referred to his website about 243 times and appeared genuinely rattled any time the restless audience began burbling with either approval or disapproval. At certain points, if someone had whispered "boo", he might have just darted for the wings.

The congressional candidates were mercifully spared a full hour of the nonsense and spent a mere 30 minutes warbling mostly about "the vote".

Incumbent Democrat Jim Marshall mentioned a letter he received from the AARP, one of the debate sponsors, about half a dozen times in the hope that the powerful blue hair lobby would provide the karmic bailout bandaid he so desperately needed.

Republican challenger Rick Goddard spewed about better handling of the taxpayers money and his knowledge that 90% of Georgia opposed the bailout. Of course he had this handy fact because before making a public statement on the hot potato of the day, he had polled extensively - including inadvertently quizzing Jim Marshall's campaign office.

Somewhere in the middle, Goddard said "this is a strong market" and Marshall said he "hadn't paid much attention to either (Presidential) candidate's plans for Iraq". Despite the strength of these two gaffes, no blood ran because after 90 minutes of beating rain and bleating politicians, few still cared.

Afterward, when the hands were shook and signs were stowed, all waited in the lobby for the rain to cease lashing the fairground. There would be no quick aboslution for these political desperadoes who had invaded this innocent land of funnel cakes and candy apples.

Eventually the storm waned and a bright moon emerged from the clouds. Mr. Henry must have decided to once again rest easy - for tomorrow, the cleaner parade of cows and pigs would return to his arena.

Wednesday, December 03, 2008

What Is Goin' On: Another Election Hangover



Wilson and I discuss life now that the infernal, eternal election is finally over.

Tuesday, December 02, 2008

Quick And Dirty Voter Guide

Runoff today.

SENATE - Vote Martin. At least he's for individual privacy.

PSC - Vote Powell. Despite certain obnoxious football ravings of his progeny (almost cost him my vote), he's reasonable on energy policy and does not have a long history of canoodling with certain companies containing the initials GP.

COURT OF APPEALS - Vote Doyle. She all but told the Georgia Christian Alliance (all theocracy! all the time!) to stick their questionnaire where the sun don't shine. That tickles me a bit.

Tuesday, November 25, 2008

New Jim Powell Ad


"Brand New Day" - Jim Powell for Georgia Public Service Commission from Jim Powell for GA PSC on Vimeo.

Gotta say I like the music. (The music's always important.)

Wednesday, November 19, 2008

Libertarian Endorses Powell

The Libertarian who threw the PSC District 4 race into a runoff is endorsing Democrat Jim Powell.
“After speaking with Mr. Jim Powell I’ve discovered that he too has the vision for a new system that would allow for both a free market in energy and a growth in green technology,” Givens said in a news release. “Mr. Powell also shares my strong opposition to ex parte communications, the behind-closed-doors dealings between PSC members and the industries they are charged with regulating. He will stand up for transparency in government. I strongly encourage all voters, Libertarian and fiscally conservative to vote for Jim Powell.”
I'll be revealing who I'll vote for in the runoffs tomorrow but I don't think it will be a big surprise.

Wednesday, November 05, 2008

Integrity


I only met one candidate last night but it was an interesting encounter.

Before one of her advisors rushed to tell her to cease talking to someone who might report her every word, I asked House District 80 Democratic candidate Michele Conlon what separated her from opponent Mike Jacobs.

Her one word response - "integrity".

Good answer.

Don't expect Ms. Conlon to once again fade into the background.

Gonzo Election Night

Unfiltered, straight from your scribe's notebook.

*Manuels parking lot is full at 5:00

*Manuels is total chaos

*It feels like the Super Bowl in here

*Bartender friend says the are "making bank"

*John Sugg sighting

*Jay Bookman sighting

*Off to the Hyatt

*The cab driver is very excited

*The last time I heard this many cars honking on Peachtree was when the Braves won the World Series

*Red Clay has the best spread. Young Dems suite looks like a dorm room

*Turn around, you're on TV!

*Now the DJ is playing Bobby McFerrin. WTF?

*I just got picked up and shook like a rag doll by a man and I'm not a small guy

*Jesus God! What time do I have to wake up in the morning?

What Is Goin' On: Election Hangover


What time is it, Mabel?

Wilson and I survived the big night and actually got up this morning to talk about what happened.

We covered everything from Otis to Outkast.

Listen here.

And yes I know the runoff is December 2 not the 5th. It was early.

Monday, November 03, 2008

The Griftdrift Voter Guide


A quick checklist for independents, moderates, snarkmeisters and those that just want to give somebody the finger.

Amendment 1 - No
Amendment 2 - Flip a coin
Amendment 3 - Yes

House 80 - Jacobs
House 81 - Huttman

PSC District 4 - Powell
Court of Appeals - McFadden or Meyer von Bremen

8th Congressional District - Marshall

U.S. Senate - Buckley

U.S. President - Obama

God save the Republic!

Thursday, October 30, 2008

The Election - The President


On paper, I should have voted for Hillary Clinton.

But I didn't.

On paper, I should vote for Bob Barr or even John McCain.

But I won't.

We stand at one of those moments which will live forever - a point of divergence. It is an instant where the usual fodder of elections - tax policy, spending policy, big vs. small government - must be put aside in order to view life in a greater perspective.

We are at a time where America's standing in the world has a chance to be restored. We can begin to undo the damage of eight years of disastrous foreign policy. We can reinforce the entire planet's belief that America is a place where although we tend to show our flaws right out in the open, we eventually do the right thing.

Also, there is a political party in our system which must be forced to endure the soul searching it so desperately needs. It must reflect on what it once was, what it has become and what it may become. Our system works best when both parties display strength tempered by reason and one party faces the abyss of obscurity if it is not reminded of this balance.

It is time for a fundamental realignment.

It is simply time.

VOTE Barack Obama

The Election - The Senate


One man will try to invade your pocketbook and your bedroom.

One man will try to invade your pocketbook but not your bedroom.

One man will do his damnedest to do neither.

Now, more than any time in your life, is the moment to make a stand. Send a message about the things that really matter.

VOTE Allen Buckley.

When the runoff gets here, we'll talk again.

Next: The President

Wednesday, October 29, 2008

The Election - 8th Congressional District


(Editor's Note: I will only write about the 8th. If you believe any of the other races are close, feel free to post in the comments, where I'll probably laugh at you)

It would be tempting to use the mule rule here, but Democrat Jim Marshall has been involved in enough high profile issues over the last two years to merit a closer look.

Marshall drives progressives absolutely wild. He voted against the children's healthcare program Peachcare. He supported the Iraq war and the surge. Hell, he touts a cozy relationship with right wing talk shows in his radio ads.

Progressives will tell you he needs to challenged to push him to be more Democrat-like. Realists will tell you in order for any Democrat to win the 8th district, a candidate has to be Republican-lite.

Despite all the weirdness of Marshall's stances, none of them are the white elephant. None of them should be the determining factor.

The true outlier is the bailout.

It was one of those votes where if your re-election is fairly safe you can vote for the thing and weather the consequences or if you are in trouble, it is an opportunity to spout populist rhetoric to stir up the passions of the anti-Washington/Wall Street crowd. Very few voted simply in a way which they believed was right.

It takes a brave man to run as a Democrat in a district so ardently Republican. It takes a braver man to cast a critical vote which may destroy his political career.

I do not know if the bailout is wisdom or folly. Only time will tell if it was a necessary evil or a tremendous boondoggle. However, I do know that it provided Jim Marshall with yet another opportunity to display a willingness to do the difficult instead of the convenient.

That particular trait is a rare commodity in politics these days. Agree or disagree with the particulars of the politics, but we should all agree the 8th and Georgia is fortunate to possess a representative with this type of resolve.

VOTE Jim Marshall.

Tuesday, October 28, 2008

The Election - House 81

Someone recently said, "nothing turns off an independent faster than negative campaigning". That's gospel.

If the campaign for House District 81 were about Republican Jill Chambers record as a reformer of MARTA, advocate of a woman's right to choose or her obstinate battle to throw cold water on the rush to create the city of Dunwoody, this bit of political writing would quickly conclude with the simple "Vote Chambers".

Unfortunately for the voters of north Dekalb, Georgia and the state of politics in general, instead the battle for the 81st is about mailers.

Jill Chambers has never shied from rough politicking. As Rusty put it, she plays with her "cleats up".

But her initial mailer implying that Democratic challenger Chris Huttman was involved in "hard core pornography" was absurd. More troubling, Chambers response to Creative Loafing was a lame non-denial denial followed by the politician's karmic band-aid of "that's politics".

In 2000, John McCain begged George Bush to stop the push polling implying McCain had fathered an interracial child. Bush responded, "That's politics, John. Senator, it's just politics."

At this point, the final line changes to "Vote Huttman".

Then they had to bring mamas into it.

Huttman has never been known to take jabs lightly. He recently responded with his own mailer accusing Chambers of trying to cover up medical lobby influence on her CON vote by telling a "sob story" about her mother's battle with cancer.

Now, much as certain writers frame their product through the perspective of life experience, legislators certainly use life experience to weight support for policy. It is true sometimes particular life experiences may result from a close relationship with cold hard cash, but if you're going to allege the graft is being obfuscated by an ill mama, you better be sure.

Now the final line shifts back to "Vote Chambers".

Rep. Chambers responded with an email decrying Huttman's use of her now deceased mother. And if she'd stopped right there, she might have been back on the side of the Lord.

Instead, Chambers went on to use the tragedy of her mother's death to attempt to justify her politics. That's not framing politics through life experience. That's playing politics with things that should remain most personal.

The only thing worse than taking a shot at an ill mama is using a dead mama as a political prop.

I also lost my mother to cancer. I rarely talk about it - even to my closest friends. I try to stay grounded in cold reality when talking politics and I understand that politicians will say damn near anything to get elected, but I just can't get my head around this one. There is no scenario where I can conceive of using the story of my mother pain for personal gain. It just ain't right.

I wish the 81st race was about the issues. Rep. Chambers has been an effective legislator. I believe Chris Huttman has the potential to be an effective legislator. They could have had a soaring debate on what really matters to the citizens of north Dekalb.

Instead we are left with choosing the one we consider the least dirty.

I really wish I could tell you to just skip past this one and if you do, you will find no criticism here. But one of them has to be elected.

The final line is "Vote Huttman".

CORRECTION: A reader pointed out my inaccuracy in the quote from 2000 and points to this article which implies McCain's outrage was directed at scurrilous accusations from a fringe veteran's group. I'm not sure it is clear which smear McCain was actually referencing but the general point of the moment remains. Any version of that's politics is not a response I ever want to hear.

Next: 8th Congressional District

The Election - House 80

(Editor's note - I will only be writing about two legislature races. If you are interested in others the comment section is all yours)

A race with an actual independent! How exciting!

Not really.

Last spring, a vibrant, young knight whooshed into Georgia offering oodles of money for the battle against the traitorous, line jumper Mike Jacobs (R-80). Unfortunately, for Democrats in north Dekalb, young squire Keith Gross had a problem hidden beneath his paper mache' armor. He wasn't qualified to run in the 80th district.

Not unqualified in a let's-dive-into-the-legal-minutae Jim Powell kind of way - full bore unqualified.

Gross quietly slinked away and Democrats pulled their collective heads out of their asses quickly enough to run aforementioned posteriors around the district collecting signatures for a write-in candidate.

Michelle Conlon's (I-InNameOnlyLand) only campaign issue seems to be she's not Mike Jacobs.

Meanwhile, Mike Jacobs, he who roiled the waters by jumping to the elephants last year, spent most of the last session acting like the new playtoy for the fat cats running the joint. He voted for Glenn Richardson's (R-Parts Unknown) crazy ass tax plan. He voted for a particularly vile anti-abortion amendment that nearly scuttled the vital Grady plan.

It is to be expected that one newly minted into a political party spend some time playing punching bag on the harsher things in political life, but with those two votes, Jacobs pushed the line and possibly hurt his moderate cred for future races.

Mike you get a pass this time. But have care. Folks will watch your next actions with a new level of scrutiny.

VOTE Mike Jacobs

Next: House District 81

Thursday, October 23, 2008

The Election - Amendment III

"Shall the Constitution of Georgia be amended so as to authorize the General Assembly to provide by general law for the creation and comprehensive regulation of infrastructure development districts for the provision of infrastructure as authorized by local governments"

Infrastructure development districts are private cities. There is no way to get around this fact.

In brief, an IDD gives a private developer access to such government tools as tax free bonds to build infrastructure such as sewers, water treatment, roads and even fire stations. The developer recoups the bond payments by charging a fee, similar to an association fee, to the individual home owners.

The IDD must still be approved by the local governing body such as a county commission, it still must comply with zoning and regulation and the home owners must still pay property tax.

So why would anyone want to do this?

Small municipalities have difficulty, even through SPLOST, raising enough capital for massive infrastructure expansion. The IDD removes this burden and places it on the developer.

Developers get a break in financing by having the ability to access tools usually available only to cities and counties.

Residents pay a little more than they would in a regular community but have the privelege of living conveniently near an Applebees, Kroger and multi-island gas station. You'd be surprised how compelling these amenities are to someone who has to drive miles to get a decent, going out on the town meal.

So what's the problem?

If you listen to the Sierra Club, it's a potential sprawl nightmare. If you listen to the risk adverse, it's a potential financial boondoggle which could wipe a local governments right off the map.

In these days of dark sheltering after the orgy of sprawl, offering new development willy nilly should certainly be a concern, but tell that to someone who has to drive thirty miles to get to a Kroger. It's also a version of sprawl rarely seen in Georgia.

I've visited "The Villages" near Oxford, Florida. It is true within the compound (it's hard to describe it any other way), you will see houses jammed so close together neighbors can pass a cup of sugar from one kitchen window to another and the oasis's of retail are pockets of pavement and box stores. But if you travel just a few miles up U.S. 301, you are immediately back in the rolling pastures of central Florida. The sprawl is contained like a virus.

Also, remember, local and state environmental regulations will still be in effect. This is not a free pass to developers and frankly, the Sierra Club's vague reaction here feels like a hammer-on-the-knee kick at the "evil builders".

The possibility of a developer defaulting is much more of a concern. It has happened in states such as Florida, although not very often, and it is always a mess. In this scenario the debt falls back on the local municipality and remember they are the ones who couldn't afford it when it wasn't under water. If the locals can't pay or can't find the scoundrel who skipped town, it defaults back to the state. But guess what happens right now if a local municipality defaults and crashes - it falls back on the state. This is the reason the legislature has to approve such things as the city of Johns Creek setting up a Parks Department. If Johns Creek goes belly up, the state is on the line for the payments.

So, the defaulting process is not that much different than it is now but the default itself could be much deeper than normal and that should be a concern.

But before we decide, let's get back to our basic tests.

First, the issue is extending government powers to private entities and there is no doubt that is a constititutional level question.

Second, it undoubtedly makes the Constitution more complicated (although less than other amendments) so the amendment must show the benefit is greater than the sin.

To answer that question, you must weigh the benefits rural communities would receive against the potential risk of developer malfeasance.

Having seen these "private cities" work in Florida and I mean work for everyone (developers make oodles of money, homeowners live with convenience, governments get more tax money), it is my belief the potential benefits far outweigh the potentials sins.

VOTE YES on Amendment III.

UPDATE: For another view here is an article by Chuck Bonner of Hiking with Chuck.

Next: House Race 80 and 81

To view amendments in their entirety please go here

Tuesday, October 21, 2008

The Election - Amendment I

"Shall the Constitution of Georgia be amended so as to provide that the General Assembly by general law shall encourage the preservation, conservation, and protection of the state's forests through the special assessment and taxation of certain forest lands and assistance grants to local government"

Ahhh taxes. If there is anything more gooped up than the Constitution, it is the tax code. Soon, every individual will have their own personalized tax exception. When you also consider no meaningful tax change can occur without changing the Constitution, we have goop piled on top of goop.

First, let's look at the positives. This amendment certainly would encourage large timber growers to continue planting loblollies instead of selling off bits and pieces for a quick capital infusion. Also, there are some indications that Georgia is less competitive due to surrounding states offering similar breaks.

I certainly have sympathy here. Not only has my family participated in the conversion of farmland to pines but my property taxes recently doubled due to letting an agricultural covenant lapse. Amendment I is an extension of this type of covenant to large timber growers.

Covenants freeze property values for a number of years, at least ten, as long as the owner makes no substantial change in the purpose of the land. In this case, the timber growers would be required to continue to harvest trees for a long time instead of suddenly building hundreds of McMansions on the same property.

Here's the problem.

Not included in what you will see on your voting screen is the following clause "The General Assembly is directed to appropriate funds to local government to partially offset any loss of local revenue".

Does anyone think any local government won't scream "help us we're poor"? What we have here is a taxpayer shell game.

Conservation is a good thing and the timber industry is a bright spot in the state of Georgia. The goal here is good but the method is not. We should be able to help them without making the code more byzantine.

Vote no on Amendment 1.

Next: Amendment II

To view amendments in their entirety please go here.