Don't usually toot my own horn, but this statement from analysis by the commenting platform
Disqus sounds awfully familiar.
Pseudonyms are kind of a cross between the two: You can say what you want without fear of retribution (a la anonymity) but you also want to cultivate a persona, and, typically, you don't want it to be hated. The result? Better comments.
From
August 2007:
Unlike the real namers however, their credibility is based primarily on context. The semi-anonymous develops a reputation based not on name but on the content of their work. If the work is credible and consistent, the handle can become almost as legitimate as a real name.
The internet changes many things, but some truths remain consistent.
1 comment:
I approve this post
Post a Comment